Friedrich Nietzsche Morals Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Friedrich Nietzsche Morals - Essay ExampleHis radical moral philosophy has been a probing topic of analysis in philosophy and thither have been several articles dealing with his moral philosophy. There have also been several significant attempts to associate his moral philosophy with other distinctive areas of knowledge including acquirement, epistemology, ethics, and literature. One such critical approach has observed Nietzsche as a bridge mingled with nineteenth-century atomistic science and process philosophy in twentieth-century physics, literature and ethics. Friedrich Ulfers and Mark Daniel Cohen, in their important article, Friedrich Nietzsche as Bridge from Nineteenth-Century Atomistic Science to Process Philosophy in Twentieth-Century Physics, Literature and Ethics, attempt to establish that philosophy has its antecedent in science and Nietzsches moral philosophy illustrate this point. The major thesis of their article is that the late nineteenth-century philosopher Fri edrich Nietzsche completed a philosophy rooted in science and succeeded in laying the foundation for a system of values capable of generating alternate forms of cultural expression-- more of which have come to fruition in our own time, many of which have yet to be achieved. In particular, his philosophy, beginning in science, is capable of setting standards for and structuring radical formations in epistemology, ethics, and literature. (Ulfers and Cohen, 21) This paper undertakes an analysis of the article by Ulfers and Cohen in order to comprehend the major arguments of the authors and to respond to them with careful reasoning. Introducing their major arguments, Ulfers and Cohen mention that distinctive emergence of philosophy, art, literature, and science or the signal moments of culture in our social animateness resulted in the systems of values and they bring about the connection between values and such essential areas of knowledge. The authors also make it explicit that there is essential descent between science and moral values. Even presumably objective scientific theories are barometric readings of our assumptions and implicit values. They are litmus tests of the cultural agar in which they grow--indicators of the fertility and of the active bases and acids of the ideological loam (Ulfers and Cohen, 21) This is a major attempt by the authors to connect value system and scientific roots and they maintain that science has a distinctive connection with everything that mount from the soil. Even the natures of human beings are closely linked with sciences. It is in this background that the authors of the article present their chief proposition that Friedrich Nietzsche established a philosophy which was rooted in science and put down the groundwork for a system of values that could produce alternate forms of cultural expression. Ulfers and Cohen stipulate that Nietzsches philosophy started in science and it can lay down standards for and structure fundam ental formations in epistemology, ethics, and literature. Therefore, the central argument of the article attempts to illustrate the connection between science and moral value system with the example of Nietzsches philosophy. Nietzsche was primarily an ontologist -- a philosopher of the real, a delver